WEB EXCLUSIVE

As a result of increased usage of technology and criticisms of traditional teaching, some instructors are switching to a method of teaching known as a “flipped classroom.” The premise is simple; according to Wikipedia, a flipped classroom is one where students watch videos at home and do problem-solving during class time. Essentially, it is as the name implies; students do “classwork” at home and “homework” at school. This is a new and potentially innovative approach to teaching. However, many critics say that this teaching style may not be as beneficial as it may seem. 

The most obvious drawback to a flipped classroom is the fact that not all students have access to Internet or technology at home. While this teaching style may be beneficial for students with Internet access, students without Internet may struggle greatly catching up with their schoolwork in a flipped classroom. This creates a situation where students with technology access may have an unfair advantage over students without said access. Furthermore, it is not a viable way of teaching for most students.

While it is true that the videos can be rewinded and paused, and thus may be easier for students to pay attention to, it can also result in the opposite effect. When someone is not learning face-to-face with a teacher, they can be easily distracted. Flipped classrooms also make it harder to ask questions; it is more beneficial for students to ask questions as they come to mind. 

The concept of video lessons is not necessarily harmful. Video lessons can supplement in-person learning; it is not an either-or situation. However, video lessons should not replace traditional teaching. The most accessible teaching method for all students is to incorporate methods of both traditional classrooms and flipped classrooms into teaching. For instance, students could watch video lessons for extra help. However, completely replacing face-to-face lessons with flipped classrooms is not feasible for many students.